Figurehead的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列必買單品、推薦清單和精選懶人包

The Life, Work and Legacy of Friedrich Engels: Emerging from Marx’’s Shadow

為了解決Figurehead的問題，作者 這樣論述：

As the author of The Condition of the Working Class in England and, along with Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto, Friedrich Engels is a seminal 19th-century figure; the co-founder of Marxism, he left an indelible impression as a philosopher, political theorist, economist, historian and revolutio

nary socialist. The Life, Work and Legacy of Friedrich Engels is nevertheless the first book to comprehensively explore Engels’ contributions in all of these spheres. The book sees 13 experts from a range of scholarly backgrounds examine Engels and his writing in relation to topics including the Uni

ted States and the future of capitalism, European social democracy and the nature of the political economy, with technology, capital, and labor acting as fundamental cross-cutting themes throughout. The volume analyses the intriguing relationship between Engels and Karl Marx, the towering historical

figure whose long shadow has obscured the achievements of Engels for so long, and reassesses Engels’ significance in this context. There are 66 images to be found throughout the text, 30 of these in colour, as well as a conclusion which successfully views Engels in the context of the age. As a jour

nalist, author and communist figurehead, Engels dealt succinctly - and with strong opinions - with the core questions of the developments changing the globe in the 19th century and The Life, Work and Legacy of Friedrich Engels finally shines a light on this in a compelling call for revisionism.

Figurehead進入發燒排行的影片

論沒入大陸船舶之研究—以《兩岸人民關係條例》與《行政罰法》適用分析為核心

為了解決Figurehead的問題，作者羅平 這樣論述：

海巡機關對於未經許可進入限制及禁止水域之大陸船舶，祭出「六大手段」作為遏阻越界情事之措施；其中，沒入船舶處分對於行為人財產權上所負擔之義務相對較重，從而具有兩層涵義。其一為海巡機關裁處沒入船舶處分時，對於所有人之認定更應格外謹慎；其二為因船舶價值動輒甚高，行為人藉以系爭船舶為第三人所有為由，試圖規避沒入處分，亦使行政效能乃以彰顯。《行政罰法》第21條原則性規定沒入之物應屬受處罰者所有為限，惟《臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例》第32條中，並未明文能否就第三人所有之船舶逕行沒入；作為規範兩岸人民往來事務之特別規定，其條文所尚未完備之處應爰引其他法律補足，以致於實際適用上存有疑義。從現行我國特別行

政法律中以觀，沒入之種類以及明文方式紊亂，其中不乏不以所有人是否具有責任要件為前提之沒入，然而此種規定並非皆合於法理，過度濫用或任意擴大解釋特別沒入條文恐有架空《行政罰法》原則性之虞。職是之故，本文將以《行政罰法》沒入原則作為基礎，分析當中國大陸船舶由敵船之國防安全對象，轉換為執法對象之後，探討依據《臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例》第32條沒入第三人所有之大陸船舶適法性，試圖提出淺見，以期未來修法時得以完善相關制度。

The Life, Work and Legacy of Friedrich Engels: Emerging from Marx’’s Shadow

為了解決Figurehead的問題，作者 這樣論述：

As the author of The Condition of the Working Class in England and, along with Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto, Friedrich Engels is a seminal 19th-century figure; the co-founder of Marxism, he left an indelible impression as a philosopher, political theorist, economist, historian and revolutio

nary socialist. The Life, Work and Legacy of Friedrich Engels is nevertheless the first book to comprehensively explore Engels’ contributions in all of these spheres. The book sees 13 experts from a range of scholarly backgrounds examine Engels and his writing in relation to topics including the Uni

ted States and the future of capitalism, European social democracy and the nature of the political economy, with technology, capital, and labor acting as fundamental cross-cutting themes throughout. The volume analyses the intriguing relationship between Engels and Karl Marx, the towering historical

figure whose long shadow has obscured the achievements of Engels for so long, and reassesses Engels’ significance in this context. There are 66 images to be found throughout the text, 30 of these in colour, as well as a conclusion which successfully views Engels in the context of the age. As a jour

nalist, author and communist figurehead, Engels dealt succinctly - and with strong opinions - with the core questions of the developments changing the globe in the 19th century and The Life, Work and Legacy of Friedrich Engels finally shines a light on this in a compelling call for revisionism.

《威瑪憲法》的遺緒？張君勱憲法的總統角色再思考

為了解決Figurehead的問題，作者周學甫 這樣論述：

我國於1946年所制定，並於1947年元月所公布的憲法，是由當時中國第三勢力的領袖人物張君勱先生（1887-1969）所設計。而因張君勱早年對《威瑪憲法》的鑽研與高度評價，故1947年憲法中混合「實權總統與內閣制（議會制）」的憲政體制──張君勱稱之為「修正式之內閣制」──，向來被研究者認為具有濃厚的威瑪半總統制（雙首長制）氣味。然而，「張君勱的憲政設計受《威瑪憲法》影響」的說法雖被不少研究者所共享，在既有的張君勱研究中，卻尚未有研究者深入梳理「張君勱如何理解威瑪總統所應扮演的憲政角色」，以及「他對1947年憲法體制的設計與解釋，又在哪些面向上展現出《威瑪憲法》的精神」等問題。也因相關討論的闕

如，以至於既有研究並無法精確地掌握張君勱對1947年憲法中的「實權總統」之想像。 對此，本文雖不否認張君勱的憲政設計係受《威瑪憲法》影響的觀點。但試圖藉由張君勱評析、闡釋《威瑪憲法》與1947年憲法之文本，重新勾勒1947年憲法之總統的職掌與憲政地位。透過相關書寫，本文將指出：張君勱對1947年憲法中實權總統的想像，實際上乃是如同威瑪總統在「應然面上」所扮演的角色般，常態時高拱於黨派政治之上，僅有在必要時方得動用憲法所賦予的實權。在這個意義上，1947年憲法體制，其實可以歸類為今日憲政研究所定義的半總統制憲政的一支。