Go off meaning的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列必買單品、推薦清單和精選懶人包

Go off meaning的問題,我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍,推薦Sarotte, M. E.寫的 Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of Post-Cold War Stalemate 和Peter F. Drucker的 Drucker on Totalitarianism and Salvation by Society都 可以從中找到所需的評價。

另外網站Jobseeker's Transitional payment - Citizens Information也說明:Conditions for getting JST. You must satisfy the Jobseeker's Allowance means test. Income from work is assessed differently for JST (see below). To be eligible ...

這兩本書分別來自 和博雅所出版 。

中國文化大學 政治學系 林炫向所指導 盧俊昇的 情緒對外交決策之影響:以韓戰期間的中共與美國為例 (2021),提出Go off meaning關鍵因素是什麼,來自於情緒、情緒轉向。

而第二篇論文中國文化大學 觀光事業學系觀光休閒事業碩士在職專班 何慧儀教授所指導 鄭乃禎的 創新科技對觀光產業的影響與應用‐以AR/VR為例 (2021),提出因為有 擴增實境、虛擬實境、創新擴散理論、創新抵制理論、鑽石模型理論的重點而找出了 Go off meaning的解答。

最後網站Taking sick leave - GOV.UK則補充:Taking sick leave. Employees can take time off work if they're ill. They need to give their employer proof if they're ill for more than 28 days.

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Go off meaning,大家也想知道這些:

Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of Post-Cold War Stalemate

為了解決Go off meaning的問題,作者Sarotte, M. E. 這樣論述:

A leading expert on foreign policy reveals how tensions between America, NATO, and Russia transformed geopolitics in a Foreign Affairs Best Book of 2021"Sarotte has the receipts, as it were: her authoritative tale draws on thousands of memos, letters, briefs, and other once secret documents--incl

uding many that have never been published before--which both fill in and complicate settled narratives on both sides."--Joshua Yaffa, New Yorker"The most engaging and carefully documented account of this period in East-West diplomacy currently available."--Andrew Moravcsik, Foreign Affairs Not one i

nch. With these words, Secretary of State James Baker proposed a hypothetical bargain to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev after the fall of the Berlin Wall: if you let your part of Germany go, we will move NATO not one inch eastward. Controversy erupted almost immediately over this 1990 exchange--but

more important was the decade to come, when the words took on new meaning. Gorbachev let his Germany go, but Washington rethought the bargain, not least after the Soviet Union’s own collapse in December 1991. Washington realized it could not just win big but win bigger. Not one inch of territory ne

eded to be off limits to NATO. On the thirtieth anniversary of the Soviet collapse, this book uses new evidence and interviews to show how, in the decade that culminated in Vladimir Putin’s rise to power, the United States and Russia undermined a potentially lasting partnership. Prize-winning histo

rian M. E. Sarotte shows what went wrong.

Go off meaning進入發燒排行的影片

牽著我的手帶我飛?

你可以帶Lisa飛嗎?

作詞作曲編曲: Lisa Hui
主唱與和音:Lisa Hui
音樂後期與歌詞視頻製作:Lisa Hui
音樂製作:Lisa Hui

緣分帶來了好奇與完美的期待, 可是次次沒到結局就徹底失望。世界這麼多人? 為何卻與你相遇以及陷入愛的危險旅程以及危險懸崖?
Lisa不要您的任何承諾,因為承諾都是美麗而令人心碎的謊言,有誰確保能走到最後?其實只要你在相戀的過程中讓Lisa日日開心就好了...
您可以永遠帶著Lisa一起飛嗎?
這首曲子的特別就是Rnb與暗黑的Rock元素再加上中國風。一開始的鼓聲是Lisa打開對愛情的心窗大門,讓你牽著她的手帶她飛,離開她心裡的黑暗世界。只要溫柔的親吻Lisa額頭,她就肯和你走出她幽暗心靈世界。男人都是多心的愛人, 就算你多心, lisa也不需要你的改變, 只要你可讓Lisa日日開開心心,日夜愉快,就算最後這段感情全是謊言讓lisa傷痕累累,,Lisa都願意冒這個險,伴隨這短暫人生的快樂,享受這段溫存。
最後音樂的結尾也是鼓聲的結尾,就是Lisa把自己再次關進了門裡。代表這一切美麗的愛情是不存在的, 都是自己Lisa騙自己,所以音樂的尾聲是代表在她雖然把門關上了,當然,憤怒歸憤怒,可是那些愛情的回憶就跟曲子的結尾一樣,一直會在心底揮之不去。

Lyrics, Composer and Arranger: Lisa Hui
Lyrics video production: Lisa Hui
Music production: Lisa Hui

Take my hand and fly me? Can you fly Lisa? Fate brings curiosity and perfection expectations, but every time it reaches the end, I am completely disappointed. So many people in the world? Why would I meet you and fall into a dangerous journey of love? Looks like Lisa want to go to the cliff?
Lisa doesn't want any of your promises, because promises are beautiful and heartbreaking lies. Who can make sure that they will come to the end? In fact, as long as you make Lisa happy every day in the process of falling in love... Can you fly with Lisa forever? The special thing about this song is that Rnb and dark Rock elements set off the rhythm of Chinese style percussion. The drumbeat at the beginning was when Lisa opened the door to love, let you take her by the hand and lead her to fly away from the dark world in her heart. As long as you gently kiss Lisa's forehead, she is willing to walk out of her dark world with you.

Men are hearty lovers like Casanova. Even if you are a Casanova, Lisa does not need your change. As long as you can make Lisa happy daily day and night, even if the relationship lasts with all lies .
Lisa is willing to take this risk, accompany you through the happiness of this short life, and enjoy this tenderness.
The end of the music is also the end of the drums, meaning that Lisa shut herself in the door again. It means that all this beautiful love does not exist, it is Lisa who lied to herself, so the end of the music means that although she closed the door, besides her anger, the memories of those love are still the same as the end of the song music, which has been echoey waving in her heart that won't go away and will stay forever.

情緒對外交決策之影響:以韓戰期間的中共與美國為例

為了解決Go off meaning的問題,作者盧俊昇 這樣論述:

近年來隨著腦神經科學的進步,情緒與理性的二分法觀點已受到挑戰與修正。情緒與理性是不可截然兩分的整體機制,這樣的觀點已然衝擊各個研究領域,帶來一波新的「行為革命」浪潮,當然也為國際關係研究帶來了一波「情感轉向」或「情緒轉向」。從2000年開始,陸陸續續有國際關係學者開始倡議重視情感和情緒的研究,基於這樣一個重要觀念轉折的契機,本文嘗試以這波國際關係「情緒轉向」的研究成果,來探討情緒在韓戰的決策過程中扮演一個怎樣的角色。主流國際關係對於戰爭的分析,多半是建立在理性計算的現實主義視角上。理性選擇理論熱衷於把理性和自利的假設,廣泛運用於政治行為的研究中;但個體不可能全盤掌握到最佳可行決策中所需的全部

資訊,顯然人們不是完全的理性,自然也就無法達到經濟學中「效用最大化」的這一目標。換句話說,人是會犯錯的,會受到各種內在與外部因素的影響,進而做出各種不理性的決策,所以情緒也可能是影響決策者的重要因素之一。本論文採質化研究,以論述分析與個案研究做為主要核心研究方法,並透過Todd H. Hall的三種情緒性論述分析(情緒性陳述論述、情緒性挑釁論述與情緒性論述),來分析韓戰期間美國與中共在決策過程中,是否受到情緒影響而做出不理性的決策。最後本文研究發現,無論是威權國家或是民主國家,其國內政治的激情往往會導致決策者上喪失在實際戰場上的理性判斷。從韓戰中美雙方的分析中可以發現,國家決策者與戰場指揮官的

判斷往往不一致:不論是美軍或是共軍的最終決策者,最終均決定聽從政治的激情而非戰場實際的情況。此可彰顯本文的論點:政治激情往往會凌駕於理性決策之上,進而做出不理性的決策。

Drucker on Totalitarianism and Salvation by Society

為了解決Go off meaning的問題,作者Peter F. Drucker 這樣論述:

  TO OUR READERS   I have long wanted to compile a volume that brings together Peter Drucker’s discourses on totalitarianism and salvation by society to make them easily accessible to readers. Now the work has finally been completed.   The book is comprised of selections from five of Peter Drucker

’s works, The End of Economic Man, The Ecological Vision, Landmarks of Tomorrow, Adventures of a Bystander, and A Functioning Society. My job was to sort the content into nine chapters, draw up titles, and write related introductions to the chapters. Drucker’s reflections on and critiques of totalit

arianism run through most of his works, but they are more focused and systematic in the five books mentioned above. Known as “the father of modern management”, Peter Drucker had a lifelong hatred of totalitarianism. He studied management because he felt that only the effective management of pluralis

tic social organizations—including non-profit organizations, industrial and commercial enterprises, and government agencies—could provide options or alternatives to resist totalitarian rule.   Totalitarianism is an ugly phenomenon in human society and politics, and it is also a terrifying disease.

It has caused more suffering to humankind than any other tyranny in history. What it seeks is to fully and thoroughly manipulate and control every individual, both in body and mind, turning humans not only into animals but also into machines and tools as well. Totalitarianism aims for absolute power

, but no one except the Creator has such power. Hence, it manifests as a state of absurdity and madness in which “the movement (persecution) is everything, yet there is no purpose.” By its nature, totalitarianism cannot tolerate the existence of even a tiny bit of humanity. The Nazis’ “final solutio

n” (genocide), the mass murder of Jews, is its logical result. Today, highly developed new technologies are also providing imaginative physical and psychological methods of manipulation, giving those with totalitarian ambitions the means to carry out a “final solution,” the extinction of unmankind (

the extinction of human nature; that is, essentially exterminating the human species.) Totalitarianism is the result of the failure of “salvation by society”.   History has repeatedly proven that any perfect, or nearly perfect society that claims to have no conflict, no class differences, complete

fairness, justice, benevolence, and harmony, is a utopia. However, using society to eliminate evil in human nature, to save human beings from depravity, and transform them into perfect people, is merely a naïve fantasy. Marxism is the most recent, most rigorous, and most alluring social rescue plan

but also the utmost failure at “salvation by society”. Today, political parties and nations still under the banner of Marxist communism or socialism have essentially sunken into totalitarianism.   From the perspective of philosophy, “Salvation by society” belongs to the category of absolute rationa

lism. It originates from human beings’ pride and conceit, is the notion that people can grasp absolute truth and become the master of everything in the world, including their own destiny.   Tracing their respective roots in different fields of knowledge, people regard their discoveries as the only

correctness. They develop various “isms,” including progressivism, scientism, economic utilitarianism, rational liberalism, nationalism or ethnocentrism, and socialism and communism.      These doctrines may be impeccable logically, and some are emotionally moving. But they all have an a priori hypo

thesis that cannot be empirically proven or falsified—that is, human beings can be absolutely rational and can comprehend absolute truth.   Now we finally know this priori hypothesis is wrong, not because of logic’s merits or demerits, but because it simply doesn’t work in real life. So, where is t

he way out? Peter Drucker suggested that we return to spiritual values and faith: to experience and recognize there is a higher authority beyond society and above human beings. That authority has already planted compassion and justice in human’s hearts, what we usually call “conscience.” If humans i

ndeed have a purely rational nature, conscience is its master. With conscience derived from faith, rationality can perform its beneficial functions. Like the conservatism’s counterrevolutionary movement that took place in the United States and Great Britain more than two hundred years ago, it shines

with the glory of true freedom and genuine rationality: Those movements were constructive, not destructive; they appealed to the love, faith, and humility of Christ. Based on religious conviction, they firmly rejected human’s absolute rationality, or irrational absolutism, and were solemnly committ

ed to human dignity.        Peter Drucker inherited the tradition of the conservatism’s counterrevolution in the United States and Great Britain. Inspired by observing social and political realities in the United States, he formed a social concept that differs from a social rescue plan (salvation by

society): lesser evils instead of greater good. Although imperfect, it would create a less painful and tolerable society. Such a society should have the following characteristics:   1. It would replace solipsistic “isms” with an open and tolerant attitude.   2. It would replace centralized and uni

form structures with diversified social organization and decentralized power centers.   3. It would replace revolutionary dogma with experimental, gradual improvement and review from time to time.   4. It would replace the rigid social relationship that mutually exclude and negate between individual

and the whole, or between the different parts of the society, with the principle of mutual dependence and mutual benefit to establish a dynamic equilibrium between the individuals and society, freedom and order.   Such a society would not follow a preset scientific design, nor would it need to rel

y on charismatic leaders or supermen. It would not be perfect, but it would be better and achievable.   It should be emphasized that Drucker’s openness, tolerance, diversity, and eclecticism are not without a bottom line. The bottom line is that he will never tolerate any form of totalitarian autoc

racy. Drucker noted that human beings have two essential qualities that other creatures don’t have—knowledge and power. These attributes can neither be removed nor avoided, and their aims and uses must be regulated and restricted. He was wary of sovereign states and modern governments. He believed t

hat regardless of whether they adopted a democratic system or an autocratic system, they were essentially the same but only different in extent, to which they infringed on individual rights and freedoms. Therefore, within every sovereign state and modern government, there exists a gene for the growt

h of totalitarianism. When any nation abuses its knowledge and power to violate human rights, the international community must restrict or even deprive it of its sovereignty.   However, Drucker believed that thus far, the United States may be the only country that has never entirely accepted the co

ncept and system of a sovereign state. Therefore, as the leader of the free world and developed countries in the West, the United States is best suited to be the first to serve as a model for global actions to resist totalitarianism. Constructive frontiers of work are more important and decisive tha

n confrontations in the military sphere. Such frontiers are not found in the East, where totalitarianism is firmly rooted and far-reaching, but in the free world, especially in the West, where the U.S. has an advantage. These “West” frontiers are:   • the educated society;   • the world economy of

dynamic development;   • the new political concepts and institutions needed in this pluralist age, internationally,   nationally and locally; and civilizations that can take the place of the East that has vanished.   Ultimately, when the “West” constructive endeavors bring forth the tolerable new s

ociety that Ducker envisioned, restoring confidence in freedom and equality, totalitarianism will evaporate just as the sun rises and the dew will naturally be disappeared, losing its deceptive magic.   For those who are not free today, who unfortunately live under totalitarian rule or in totalitar

ian revolutionary movements, Drucker offers advice on how to deal with the environment based on his personal experiences in Europe as a teenager. The first is what not to do. Power has the potential for absolute and comprehensive control, and human nature is weak, unable to withstand the threats and

temptations of power, let alone face the opening of “Pandora’sBox”—totalitarianism. If a person is not ready to stand up, fight, and sacrifice him—or herself for righteousness— and it is only the few of the best, noblest, and courageous among us who can do that—the wisest thing to do is to break of

f with totalitarianism.   If some people try to control it with ambition or to make a deal with it by using wisdom and ingenuity, whether out of selfish motives or sincere goodwill, totalitarianism will use them, and they will become accomplices to its evildoing. In “The Monster and the Lamb” of th

is book, Drucker termed the former type “monster” and the latter “lamb.” Compared with above two types of people who voluntarily join the totalitarian camp, the other type of people is often the majority. Although they do not participate in themselves, they acquiesce totalitarianism to abuse others,

they turn their heads, safely latch their door then enjoy “peace and quiet.” Totalitarian careerists derive their greatest encouragement from public indifference, which is an “endorsement” to behave unscrupulously and do whatever they please.   As for what people should do vs what should not do, D

rucker didn’t give an easy answer. He didn’t tell us what proactive actions we can take under the terror, pressure, and false propaganda of totalitarianism that would effectively weaken totalitarian rule while protecting as much as possible ourselves and families. The situation is similar to the Bib

lical story of Abraham, who accepted God’s order to sacrifice his son. Abraham felt compelled to obey God’s command, yet also wanted to save his beloved son Isaac. Considering and formulating what strategies and courses of action is the responsibility of every entrepreneur, teacher, scholar, media p

erson, government official, professional knowledge worker, and citizen. However, the principles and directions have been given, and the constraints of the objective environment are also clear. Therefore, we can at least know the understanding of ethics, morals, and performance are required for holdi

ng a position or running a business in a totalitarian country are different than they would be for the same position or business in a democratic country. For example, if you have to set up a business in a totalitarian country, your goal should not be to contribute to the country’s GDP or tax revenue

. Nor should you aid in strengthening its national defense or “stabilizing” its society. And, not to mention that you should never use the national ideology to educate employees and unite them.     Lastly, I’d like to point out that the book ends on an optimistic note, which Drucker wrote in 1959.

He was fifty years old then, vigorous and confident. He saw a pluralistic and autonomous organizational new society taking shape in the United States and the West. The boom in modern management and the emergence of an educated group of knowledge workers (also known as the “middle class”) complementi

ng each other at that time. But on the other hand, he also noticed that mankind had begun to master knowledge of the natural science and behavioral science that could end up destroying humanity. And that kind of knowledge was creating conditions for the exercise of absolute power. In that era of gre

at change, he urged society, human beings, and individuals to “return to spiritual values and return to religion,” and he emphasized knowledge workers’ responsibilities, because in inherence, “knowledge is power, and power is responsibility.” It is also because only through the specific and subtle p

ractice of assuming responsibility and thus realizing dignity at the individual level could humankind’s long-standing grand and lofty ideal of “freedom and equality” be achieved. Hereby, I would like to revisit with the readers on Drucker’s clarion call that he made sixty years ago as encouragement

for us all:   “Everyone must be ready to take over alone and without notice, and show himself saint or hero, villain or coward... played out in one’s daily life, in one’s work, in one’s citizenship, in one’s compassion or lack of it, in one’s courage to stick to an unpopular principle, and in one’s

refusal to sanction man’s inhumanity to man in an age of cruelty and moral numbness.   In a time of change and challenge, new vision and new danger, new frontiers and permanent crisis, suffering and achievement, in a time of overlap such as ours, the individual is both all-powerless and all-powerf

ul. He is powerless, however exalted his station, if he believes that he can impose his will, that he can command the tides of history. He is all-powerful, no matter how lowly, if he knows himself to be responsible.”   Ming Lo Shao, Editor   October 2020, in Los Angeles, USA   編者簡介   FOREWORD O

N BEHALF OF THE AUTHOR   If the author of this book, Peter Drucker, were still alive, faced with the reality of the current rifts in American politics and society, I believe he would warn and advise us all, particularly the young and enthusiastic among us, with the following words from the preface

of The End of Economic Man, reprinted in 1969:   But can we still be sure? Or are there not signs around us that totalitarianism may re-infest us, may indeed overwhelm us again? The problems of our times are very different from those of the ’twenties and ’thirties, and so are our realities. But som

e of our reactions to these problems are ominously reminiscent of the “despair of the masses” that plunged Europe into Hitler’s totalitarianism and into World War II. In their behavior some groups—they racists, white and black, but also some of the student “activists” on the so-called Left—are frigh

teningly reminiscent of Hitler’s stormtroopers—in their refusal to grant any rights, free speech for instance, to anyone else; in their use of character assassination; in their joy in destruction and vandalism.   In their rhetoric these groups are odiously similar to Hitler’s speeches and so is the

dreary nihilism of their prophets to hatred from Mao to Marcus. But above all, these groups on the “Right” as well as on the “Left,” like the totalitarians of the generation ago, believe that to say “no” is a positive policy; that to have compassion is to be weak; and that to manipulate idealism fo

r the pursuit of power is to be “idealistic.” They have not learned the one great lesson of our recent past: hatred is no answer to despair.   Understanding of the dynamics of the totalitarianism of yesterday may help us better to understand today and to prevent a recurrence of yesterday. It may, I

hope above all, help young people today to turn their idealism, their genuine distress over the horrors of this world, and their desire for a better and braver tomorrow into constructive action for, rather than into totalitarian nihilism as their predecessors did thirty years ago. For at the end of

this road there could only be another Hitler and another “ultimate solution” with its gas chambers and extermination camps.   Those words not only embody the book’s practical significance today but also the historical importance it will have in the future.   Editor       November 2, 2020, America

n Presidential Election Eve   Los Angeles, USA   CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PREFACE PREFACE TO OUR READERS FOREWORD ON BEHALF OF THE AUTHOR   CHAPTER ONE The Morbid Phenomena of Totalitarian Countries Introduction 1 The Totalitarian Economic System and the “Noneconomic Society” 2 By Justifying Per

sonal Sacrifice to Deny the Meaning of Life and Society 3 Create Enemies and Incite Hatred Between Classes, Races, and Nations 4 Control the Entire Country and Society by One Top-to-bottom Totalitarian Organization 5 Mystifying Leader, Creating an Atmosphere of Personal Worship 6 Encourage Informers

and Undermine Traditional Ethical Values   CHAPTER TWO The Origins and Essence of Totalitarianism from the Prospective of Society and Politics Introduction 1 The Total Failure of Marxism Had Been a Main Reason for the Europe’s Masses to Supported Totalitarianism 2 Why Can Totalitarianism Win the Su

pport of the Masses? 3 No Revolutionary Leader Can Oppose the Inner Dynamic of the Revolution or Impose Measures That Go Against Public Opinion   CHAPTER THREE Totalitarianism Inevitably be Replaced by a New Noneconomic Society Based on Individual Freedom and Equality Introduction   CHAPTER FOUR The

Origins and Essence of Totalitarianism from the Perspective of Rationality and Faith Introduction 1 From Rousseau to Hitler 2 Why Society Is Not Enough: Introduction to The Unfashionable Kierkegaard 3 The Unfashionable Kierkegaard   CHAPTER FIVE The Origins and Essence of Totalitarianism from the P

erspective of Technology Progress Introduction Abstraction Part One of The Human Situation Today   CHAPTER SIX Criticism of Marxism Introduction 1 How Did Marxist “Political Economics” Be Debunked? 2 Marxism’s Failure   CHAPTER SEVEN Do We Want “Salvation by Society” or a Society That Is Not Perfec

t but Tolerable? Introduction 1 No More Salvation by Society 2 A Society that May Be the Best We Can Possibly Hope For   CHAPTER EIGHT The Free World’s “West” Strategy to Resist Totalitarianism Introduction 1 “The Work to Be Done”—The Overview of the “West” Strategy 2 Discussion on the Frontiers of

“West” Strategy   CHAPTER NINE How Should Individuals Deal with the Threat and Temptation of Totalitarianism? Introduction 1 The Maverick Young Drucker 2 The Monster and the Lamb 3 Abstraction Part Two of The Human Situation Today   推薦序 PREFACE   Peter Drucker was a friend and advisor to me duri

ng my leadership years at ServiceMaster. Minglo Shao has become a very special friend of mine. We first met as he became a partner of ServiceMaster, assisting us in expanding our business to China and other countries in the Far East. I later had the privilege of introducing him to Peter Drucker, and

the two of them developed a good friendship which extended over the balance of Peter’s life.   Minglo Shao has now developed an abstract of Drucker’s writings reflecting Drucker’s view on “totalitarianism and salvation by society.” As you read this, it is well to reflect upon the application of th

ese thoughts—especially to the young people of today—providing appropriate warnings and excellent advice. Thank you, Minglo, for the example of your life and your continued friendship. C. William Pollard November 2, 2020 American Presidential Election Eve Chicago, Illinois, USA 2 By Justifying Pe

rsonal Sacrifice to Deny the Meaning of Life and SocietyThe consistent new concept of society which totalitarianism proclaims is nothing but a mirage unless war is accepted not only as legitimate but as supreme. Man’s function and his place in war must lay the basis of his function and place in soci

ety altogether. Hitler’s and Mussolini’s entire social and political edifices are necessarily built upon Heroic Man as the concept of man’s true nature.* * * * *The anonymous soldier in the trenches, the equally anonymous worker on the assembly line, are fundamental symbols of this new concept of ma

n. And Ernst Juenger, the one really profound German philosopher of the totalitarian state, has therefore consciously based his new society upon the figure of the Worker-Soldier; physical pain and the ability to endure it are the basis of his new order of values.

創新科技對觀光產業的影響與應用‐以AR/VR為例

為了解決Go off meaning的問題,作者鄭乃禎 這樣論述:

台灣觀光產業已經達到成熟,而要如何持續保持現有的旅客並且吸引更多潛在旅客是一個很重要的課題。近年來,擴增實境Augmented Reality(AR)和虛擬實境Virtual Reality(VR)的技術及其應用從各個角度受到越來越多的關注。儘管對於AR/VR的技術及不同目的之應用的研究數量激增;但是,AR/VR創新科技的實際應用在旅遊行業卻是被忽略的領域。本研究以文獻回顧及專家訪談,對AR/VR創新科技應用於觀光旅遊產業的實際案例有所描繪;同時採用創新擴散與創新抵制理論,解釋AR/VR創新科技在旅遊行業受到侷限的原因;最後,用鑽石模型理論分析,對台灣觀光旅遊業者及政府相關單位提出實際可行的

建議。本研究發現:擴增實境Augmented Reality (AR)和虛擬實境Virtual Reality (VR)的創新科技是一種激發真實旅行和提升體驗的技術。AR/VR提供新的體驗價值方式,增進旅遊動機,為觀光旅遊行業長期保持競爭力。最後,本研究根據結果提出建議方案以及未來研究方向之建議。