SDE Engineer的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列必買單品、推薦清單和精選懶人包

永續發展在高等教育課程設計之比較研究－以美國商學院及工學院認證校為例

為了解決SDE Engineer的問題，作者王惠菁 這樣論述：

本論文從探討與永續(Sustainability) 相關議題的背景，進而研究近年來相關議題定義以及業界和學術界之間的發展。再一步探討永續教育在各學院中的連結及關聯性，並鎖定於美國二大認證機構下，AACSB(The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business)以及ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)中，檢視商學院及工學院課程在永續議題上的發展。研究方式以收集各學院之2009年官方網站中公布的課程資訊為基礎，共計商學院460間，工學院382間，從其區域、排

名、課程架構、關注的議題以及教學的方式加以比較分析。研究結果為(一)工學院在美國提供相關永續課程較為積極，尤其以西部地區差異最大。(二)兩種學院此網站內容方法之結果在整體學校提供相關課程中，皆比先前問卷方法呈現的結果較低。(三) 全球前100大排名之學校，在兩種學院皆提供比沒有排名校二倍以上的永續相關課程，但在必修課或大學部等課程規劃上，各學院各有不同的安排。(四)各學院依其學術背景，在永續發展上有不同關注的議題。(五)在教學方法中，兩種學院大多採用傳統教學方法居多。最後，建議業界可以參考本研究，而後能避免重覆，充份運用其相關永續經營的訓練。而學術機構可經由本研究結果作為參考，更加增進自己與他

校之前在永續課程上的互動與改進。

Types Of Solid Waste And Working Conditions As Contributing Factors To The Prevalence Of Major Respiratory Symptoms Among Municipal Waste Workers In The Gambia

為了解決SDE Engineer的問題，作者Buba Darboe 這樣論述：

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of major respiratory symptoms among Waste workers in Kanifing, a major metropolis in the Gambia, and to assess the relationship between work-related factors and the prevalence of specific respiratory symptoms.Methods: We recruited 116 workers to

participate in the study, dividing the participants into three groups according to job function: Refuse collectors, field supervisors and drivers. Participants were interviewed using a slightly modified version of the British Medical Research Council’s questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. Data obt

ained were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 18.0).Results: The prevalence of respiratory symptoms among each of the three groups of waste workers is as follows; persistent cough was 22.2% among field supervisors, 36.4% among drivers and 83.8% among r

efuse collectors. Phlegm production was 44.4% among field supervisors, 81.8% among drivers and 83.8% among refuse collectors. Shortness of breath was 11.1% among field supervisors, 30.3% among drivers and 40.5% among refuse collectors. And for wheezing, the prevalence was 11.1% among field superviso

rs, 21.2% among drivers and 27.0% among refuse collectors. Post-hoc Scheffe analysis results revealed a significant mean difference in the prevalence of persistent cough among refuse collectors, compared to field supervisors and drivers (p